I stole this from one other thread, so the subject could be mentioned with out additional hijacking the thread it was on. I hope that was OK.
Of the numerous professional/con discussions I am studying, I am seeing loads of very knowledgeable arguments that reach economic idea ranges I have no want to be taught. But I proceed to depart with the feeling that MMT supporters underestimate, (or discount), the human issue of their confidence of their prescriptions for fulfillment, and that very issue appears to be the bass drum of MMT opponent’s parade of criticism.
The entice was set and President Bush took it hook line and sinkerThe government might have and should have helped the auto trade by guaranteeing any loans as like they did in the Iocola/ Chrysler deal. NO TAXPAYER was concerned. Chrysler needed to re construct the company, union contracts, bond holders and others agreed to the phrases arrange by the government and the lending institutes.
Well, your two options are a) welfare and different security nets, or b) letting folks starve. The solely initiative driven by a lack of jobs is the initiative essential to rise up and rob a liquor retailer. From my …